The Retail Committee appreciates the government’s continued efforts to support public health and economic development. To build on the momentum gained through the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) between the United States and Taiwan, the Committee urges improving the business climate through more efficient governance, improved regulatory transparency, and enhanced digitalization. The Committee strongly believes these proposals will benefit both consumers and the retail industry while delivering high confidence in the Taiwan market.
Suggestion 1: Fulfill trade-related commitments made under the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade.
1.1 Provide a clear timeline for dietary supplement tariff reductions and regulatory definitions. The Committee supports the Healthy Taiwan and 888 Health Program initiatives proposed by President Lai Ching-te and the Executive Yuan. The dietary supplement industry plays a critical role in advancing these aims. Furthermore, we applaud Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun for her success in February in concluding the U.S.-Taiwan ART, which established reduced tariff rates to 10% on dietary supplements, yielding direct benefits to consumers. We therefore urge the government to establish a clearly defined dietary supplement category aligned with the World Customs Organization’s Harmonized System to enable Taiwan’s Customs Administration to efficiently implement the tariff reduction. Having a clear timeline will be key to attaining the goal.
1.2 Balance food safety, food sustainability, and the diversity of imported foods.
To avoid unnecessary trade interruptions and potential waste of food, we recommend that the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration (TFDA) rigorously implement Article 19 of the Act Governing Food Safety and Sanitation. When a maximum residue limit (MRL) has not been set for use of a certain pesticide on a known crop, a temporary MRL standard (such as that of a country/region where the diet is similar to Taiwan’s, such as Japan) should be assigned after a proper risk assessment.
In 2019, Taiwan announced MRL standards for the herbicide glyphosate, but later removed them for certain applications. In the absence of an established MRL for specific commodities, Taiwan’s positive list system effectively applies a non-detective standard, which can restrict the import of some U.S.-produced crops.
We believe that continuing to ban products from being imported merely because their raw materials used a specific pesticide is detrimental to the diversity of imported foods and the positive development of U.S.-Taiwan trade. The Committee urges the TFDA to conduct another risk assessment of glyphosate with an eye to re-introducing the MRL. Re-establishing MRLs where appropriate will reduce the risk of recurring technical barriers to trade for U.S.-produced crops.
Suggestion 2: Enhance the efficiency of food import procedures using appropriate tools and forms.
2.1 Use AI to avoid issues with company-name declarations during border inspections. For the purpose of border food inspection, importers are required to provide the name of the manufacturing facility. However, due to trade usage and language differences, it often happens that the name is presented differently at different times as a result of common variations such as Company and Co., Limited and Ltd., Corporation and Corp. or Inc., or Chinese-language variations like 株式会社 and (株). These differences create inconsistencies in the eyes of inspectors and require explanation, which may take a week or more to resolve. We urge the TFDA to utilize large language models (LLMs) to enhance recognition of company names and avoid unnecessary delays in the food inspection process at the border.
In addition, on the application form for inspection of food imports, we suggest that when the same company operates multiple factories in the same country, the TFDA allow the company name to be used to identify the “manufacturer,” rather than requiring the actual production premises.
2.2 Adopt a mechanism to manage naturally occurring substances. The Committee recommends that border inspections, instead of relying solely on literature-based background values, transition to a multi-evidence, science-based approach for naturally occurring substances, including benzoic and salicylic acid which are part of a plant’s natural defense mechanism, combining literature values, manufacturing data, and lab testing.
To prevent inconsistencies in which a product may face requests for additional documentation even when previous case-number protocols exist for an identical product, review standards need to be harmonized with international norms and historical custom inspection internal inspection data to eliminate non-tariff trade barriers and ensure administrative reliability.
Recommendations:
-
- Adopt “natural origin” standards. Reference Korea’s Food Additives Code to establish scientific thresholds for common naturally occurring components (e.g., benzoic acid up to 0.02 g/kg; propionic acid up to 0.10 g/kg). We suggest that importers be permitted to submit manufacturing data, raw material certifications, and accredited laboratory results to substantiate natural occurrence.
- Institutionalize review guidelines. Formalize these criteria within the Common Supplement Patterns for Imported Food Inspection to ensure procedural transparency and predictability.
- Adopt a data-driven approach to regulation. Utilize historical inspection data to calibrate scientific thresholds and improve regulatory efficiency.
2.3 Advance trade facilitation and regulatory transparency for dual-use Chinese herbal ingredients.
2.3.1 Streamline clearance processes and update regulations for the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) industry. Despite the integration of the Customs-Port-Trade (CPT) Single Window with the licensing and inspection system of the Department of Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy (DCMP) of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, there continues to be redundant batch-by-batch notifications, creating significant administrative duplication. We recommend:
-
-
- Implement a single-reporting mechanism. The Committee calls for enabling real-time data-sharing of botanical origin, quantity, and item details submitted through the CPT Single Window to the DCMP, eliminating the requirement for separate batch-by-batch reporting.
- Introduce an integrity green channel. We urge establishment of a C1-style fast-track (Customs low-risk clearance category with no file review or inspection) for importers with a proven record of compliance, aligned with Customs Administration practices.
- Establish an update mechanism for TCM regulation, with periodic reviews every two or three years following stakeholder consultation, to align with global scientific trends.
-
2.3.2 Update regulatory frameworks for TCM to align with global scientific trends. Regulatory progress regarding the medicine-food homology list has stalled due to divergent opinions, causing Taiwan’s therapeutic food sector to lag behind regional competitors. We recommend:
-
-
- Establish a biennial update cycle and conduct a mandatory review of the medicine-food homology list to ensure regulatory agility by harmonizing with regional standards and replaces blanket bans with risk-level management.
- Adopt international risk-based standards. The Committee calls on the government to reference regional catalogs (China, Japan, and South Korea, for example) to implement risk-stratified management strategies, rather than blanket prohibitions. We further urge the introduction of reasonable usage limits with mandatory warning labels to balance safety with flexibility.
- Conduct industry impact-assessment reports. We suggest quantifying the projected output value contribution to the food processing industry of specified products (for example, functional beverages or ready-to-drink meals) to shift the regulatory paradigm from prevention of non-compliance to economic facilitation.
-
2.4 Harmonize wording and usage limits for food additives and nutrient sources. In Category 8 “Nutritional Additives” under the “Standards for Specification, Scope, Application, and Limitation of Food Additives,” inconsistencies exist in the wording used to describe usage limits for general foods, which may create ambiguity in interpretation. In addition, the usage limits for nutritional additives often differ from those for food raw materials that provide the same nutrients (e.g., zinc, selenium, iron, magnesium, and molybdenum). To enhance regulatory consistency and clarity, and to safeguard consumer interests, we propose the following:
-
- Harmonize the wording used for usage limit descriptions. We recommend replacing the word “limit” from the expression “daily intake limit” with “daily intake” or “recommended daily intake.” This change will help avoid misunderstandings due to semantic inconsistencies and serve to improve the clarity and precision of the regulation.
- Align usage limits between nutritional additives and food raw materials that provide the same nutrients. An example of such discrepancy is the usage limit in the daily intake for zinc yeast as a raw material, which differs from that for zinc sulfate as a nutrient additive (30 mg vs 22.5 mg). Except where considerations related to special dietary foods apply, consistent regulatory standards should be adopted so that nutritional additives and food raw materials providing the same nutrients follow the same usage limits. This practice will facilitate industry compliance and protect consumer interests.
Suggestion 3: Promote digitalization, transparency, and international alignment in government regulation of food products.
3.1 Replace paper requirements with electronic processes to enhance digital governance and efficiency. We are grateful for the progress made by the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) last year planning the establishment of a website designed to take online applications for import permits for organic agricultural products. The Committee looks forward to implementation of this initiative to enhance the efficiency of the application process.
3.2 Promote digitalization of cross-border retail customs-clearance processes. The Taiwan government continues to advance digital governance, with the Ministry of Digital Affairs (MODA) actively promoting the use of electronic signatures. Electronic signatures strengthen the security and efficiency of online procedures and are essential for improving cross-border retail and supply chain operations. However, many customs-related processes still rely on paper documents, and existing online procedures remain limited and burdensome due to requirements such as use of the Citizen Digital Certificate, which increase user difficulty and processing time.
The Committee encourages the government to prioritize the digitalization of key processes, including long-term customs-clearance authorization through the Customs Administration, self-use declarations for high-dosage dietary supplements under the TFDA, and Bluetooth device declarations through the National Communications Commission. These improvements can be implemented while fully meeting regulatory requirements. A consistent, cross-agency application of electronic signatures would enhance trade facilitation and improve the consumer digital experience.
3.3 Prohibit the sale of imported alcoholic beverages with altered or removed original manufacturing lot codes. The Committee continues to seek solutions to this longstanding issue impacting consumer safety. The crux of the issue lies in Article 32 of the Tobacco and Alcohol Administration Act (TAAA), which explicitly stipulates that packaged alcoholic products for sale must bear a lot code. This code indicates the quantity of a product manufactured at a specified time on a specific production line. Some parallel importers have been removing the original lot codes and replacing them with their own serial numbers, which do not contain the information needed for tracing. We have previously noted that many jurisdictions require such labeling. The UK, France, Italy, Canada, and the EU all mandate that alcoholic products bear lot codes. In some countries that do not currently prohibit the removal of lot codes, discussions are underway to amend the law.
In addition, prohibiting the removal of original lot codes would not contradict the spirit of free trade, as some have alleged. Parallel importers could continue to import alcoholic products as long as they keep the original lot codes on the bottles, as required by law.
We consider it essential that alcoholic products remain traceable and recallable when food or alcohol safety is in doubt. To safeguard consumer interests, we again ask the Ministry of Finance to conduct systematic inspections and enforce the prohibition on the sale of products with removed lot codes, and to establish a robust and effective reporting mechanism to replace the current voluntary reporting of such products at the point of import.
3.4 Ensure transparency and predictability in the review process for novel ingredients. The Committee acknowledges the TFDA’s ongoing communication with industry regarding the management of novel ingredients. However, the overall review process for novel ingredient applications remains lengthy and lacks transparency. Each stage of the application dossier evaluation (the submission package) — including data assessment, ingredient safety evaluation, and preparation for advisory committee review — often requires extended processing time, with no specific timelines established for these steps. Furthermore, when errors arise during the evaluation (for example, omission of the intended scope of the application), applicants currently have no mechanism to provide timely clarification. These issues create unnecessary delays and unpredictable risks for companies, holding up market entry for new products and potentially discouraging investment in the development of novel ingredients.
To enhance regulatory consistency, improve procedural clarity, and support industry planning, the Committee recommends the following:
-
- Provide predictability in the review process. Establish defined processing timelines for each stage of review and develop a system that allows applicants to track the status of their submissions.
- Align the review of internationally recognized ingredients with U.S. FDA standards and complete evaluations within one year. For ingredients already recognized under the U.S. Food and Drug Administra-tion’s Generally Recognized as Safe framework, the TFDA may consider reducing nonessential evaluation steps and completing the review within one year. This approach would increase administrative efficiency and support the timely introduction of novel ingredients with established international safety data.
Enhancing the efficiency and predictability of the review process will support food technology innovation, facilitate trade, and contribute to a more internationally aligned and efficient regulatory environment.
Suggestion 4: Deploy age-verification technology to responsibly unlock restricted products in new online markets.
As Taiwan advances digital services and aligns with global AI trends, regulatory frameworks must evolve accordingly. The Committee suggests that laws designed for analog-era constraints be updated when they prevent the deployment of more effective digital safeguards.
Since MODA’s establishment in 2022, Taiwan has developed a digital identity infrastructure that enables secure, auditable remote verification at scale. The policy question is no longer technical feasibility, but regulatory adaptation. An example of where regulatory modernization is warranted is Taiwan’s existing restrictions on the online sale and delivery of alcohol and tobacco under Article 30 of the TAAA, which target situations where age cannot be effectively verified, reflecting earlier limitations in age-verification capability. Significant technology advances in age verification recently mean that there should no longer be a binary choice between protecting minors and supporting digitally-enabled sectors.
Responsible businesses share the government’s mandate to protect minors. Digital innovation and child welfare are complementary objectives, not competing priorities. The current prohibition assumes industry cannot be trusted with minor protection responsibilities, forcing a false choice between enabling industry development and safeguarding vulnerable populations. This mistrust prevents collaborative solutions that could strengthen minor protection beyond what the current mechanism alone achieves.
Modern verification technology enables industry to serve as active partners in minor protection rather than subjects of blanket exclusion. This approach has proved effective in international practice, where multi-step digital verification, including document authentication plus in-person confirmation at delivery, can exceed traditional retail safeguards while age verification relies solely on individual clerk judgment. A classic example is Japan’s experience in permitting online alcohol sales under a licensing framework that requires age verification at the point of purchase and may include additional checks at delivery, showing that regulated digital channels can protect minors while enabling legitimate commerce.
The Committee urges the government to leverage these capabilities through the following measures:
- Approve a controlled pilot program in a designated municipality to test verification effectiveness and generate empirical data on compliance outcomes. The program would have defined success metrics and a mutually agreed evaluation period, followed by scaled implementation upon successful validation.
- Establish a framework allowing exceptions to current legislative restrictions (for example, Article 30 of the TAAA) where businesses demonstrate that their age-verification technology meets government-approved standards.
Suggestion 5: Remove unnecessary quarantine requirements for dry pet food.
While dry pet food and coated ingredients after extrusion are regarded as safe commodities, Taiwan’s veterinary authorities have imposed restrictions on the importation of certain extruded dry pet food, citing the risk associated with Avian Influenza. Based on international practices, veterinary authorities should not require any conditions related to Avian Influenza, regardless of the avian influenza status of the exporting country or zone. As a member of the World Organization for Animal Health, Taiwan has pledged to fulfill its national member responsibilities, including providing member states with information on local animal disease epidemics and the formulation of relevant quarantine regulations to avoid unreasonable trade barriers.
The Committee recommends that the MOA follow up on its commitment to revise the relevant regulations and remove unnecessary quarantine requirements on dog and cat dry food products.
本委員會肯定政府持續支持公共衛生與經濟發展。為延續《臺美對等貿易協定》(ART)所創造的良好動能,本委員會建議透過更有效率的治理、提升法規透明度及加速數位化,進一步改善商業環境。 本委員會深信,相關提案將有助於提升市場信心,最終將使消費大眾與零售業共同受益。
建議一:落實《臺美對等貿易協定》中與貿易相關之承諾
1.1 明定膳食補充品的關稅調降時程與法規定義
「健康台灣 2030」與「三高防治888 計畫」是賴清德總統與行政院備受矚目的政策。膳食補充品產業應在此倡議中應扮演重要角色,守護全民健康。尤其,本委員會亦肯定鄭麗君副院長於二月份談判成功,簽署《臺美對等貿易協定》,卓越成果將促使膳食補充品的進口關稅調降至 10%。而消費者將是此項政策的最終贏家。 本委員會呼籲這項利多能進一步延伸至明確定義膳食補充品類別,與世界關務組織(WCO)的國際商品統一分類制度(HS 系統)接軌,有助推動海關更有效率地調降關稅。明確的政策時間表將是落實本目標的關鍵。
1.2 兼顧食品安全與糧食永續同時促進輸入食品多樣性
(1) 隨著台美之間貿易的進一步發展,以及農產品進口的增加,雙方之間出現法規上的歧異是可以預期的。為避免不必要的貿易中斷和潛在的食物浪費,我們敦促食藥署可以適當地依據《食品安全衛生管理法》第 19 條,在已知的農作物發生特殊事件且尚未有特定農藥的殘留容許量(MRL)時,可在進行適當風險評估後,採用臨時的農藥MRL限量標準。例如曾經自美國輸入燕麥片被檢出含有嘉磷塞(glyphosate),由於沒有制定MRL,致使依規定不得檢出,當時銷毀共13個貨櫃的燕麥片。倘依上述規範使用有類似飲食習慣國家之標準(例如日本嘉磷塞在燕麥殘留容許量為20ppm),或可以不用如此浪費糧食。
(2) 台灣在先前曾宣布一系列嘉磷塞的 MRL 標準,但後來隨即將其廢止。由於缺乏嘉磷塞的 MRL 標準,其已經實質上已禁止了許多類別的美國農產品進口。我們認為持續禁止使用特定農藥農產品為原料的產品進口並不利於輸入食品多樣性及台美貿易的正向發展,我們建議衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(下稱食藥署)能再次對嘉磷塞進行風險評估,訂定合理的MRL容許值,減少這種實質上針對美國農產品的技術性貿易障礙。
建議二:採取相關措施提高食品進口流程效率
2.1 運用AI輔助避免邊境食品輸入查驗的公司名稱申報問題
為完成邊境食品輸入查驗,進口商通常被要求須提供「製造商名稱」。然而,由於貿易慣例和語言差異,製造商呈現的名稱不同並不罕見,例如常見縮寫Company 變成 Co.、Limited 變成 Ltd.、Corporation 變成 Corp.、Inc.、株式會社或 (株)。這些差異在邊境查驗人員看來可能會被視為「不同」或「不一致」,而需要解釋。即使這些只是不同的表達方式,也通常需要額外一週(或以上)的時間來解決。我們敦促食藥署利用大型語言模型 (LLM)來增強對正式英文公司名稱 (例如:CO.、Company、Ltd.、Limited、株式會社、(株)、AG、S.A.S. 等)的識別能力,以避免邊境食品檢驗過程中的不必要延遲。
同樣地,在食品進口檢驗的申請表上,我們建議食藥署允許使用公司名稱申報製造商(例如:XYZ, Inc. ),而非強制要求申報同一國家中屬於同一公司的不同製造廠名稱(例如:XYZ, Inc.–New York Factory)。
2.2 建立天然物原料帶入 (Carry-Over) 管理機制
委員會建議邊境查驗允許多樣科學性補件資料,排除僅以文獻背景值為唯一判準,譬如非人為添加之天然成分(如苯甲酸、水楊酸)。
為避免即使已有相同產品之前案案號,仍因審查標準不一致而反覆要求補件,建議主管機關參考國際標準及歷史查驗資料,使審查標準一致,以降低非關稅貿易障礙,並提升行政作業之可靠性。
建議:
(1) 設定容許基準:參照韓國《食品添加劑法典》建立「天然衍生」認定規範,針對常見天然存在成分,定有科學容許量(如苯甲酸≤0.02 g/kg、丙酸≤0.10 g/kg)。另建議允許業者提交製程資訊、原料來源及認證實驗室數據作為佐證,輔以國際科學文獻,而非僅依賴單一背景值。
(2) 明訂審查流程:修正《輸入食品申請查驗常見應補件態樣》,明列申請流程與準則及上述資料,以確保程序透明度及可預測性。
(3) 建立查驗數據庫: 累積歷年案例數據,作為科學容許量訂定參考。
另,食藥署曾建議,若屬相同產品之重複案件,得提供「前案案號」以加速通關;惟 實務上,短期內(如三個月內)再次進口相同產品,業者仍頻繁遭遇不同審核人員要求重複提交相同文件或就相同是向再次提出說明之情形,增加行政負擔並影響通關效率。
建議:強化內部審查標準與審查人員教育訓練,確保不同審查人員間之標準一致性與程序可預測性。
2.3 提升藥食同源通關效率及定期清單更新
2.3.1 落實「一站式」實質通關自動化
儘管「關港貿單一窗口(CPT)」已串接衛福部中醫藥司(DCMP)的許可證及查驗系統,實務上企業仍被要求重複進行「逐批」報備,造成行政作業負擔。
建議:
-
-
- 落實「免重複報備機制」:若已於關港貿單一窗口填報完整資訊(含品項、數量、基原),落實後端數據共享,解除須另向中醫藥司逐批報備之行政要求。
- 建立中醫藥法規更新機制: 在與利害關係人進行充分諮詢後,應建立每二至三年定期審查的法規更新機制,以緊跟全球科學發展趨勢。
- 設立「誠實申報綠色通道」: 針對紀錄良好、無違規紀錄之業者,應比照關務署之 C1(免審免驗)通關模式。
-
2.3.2 建構「藥食同源」動態更新機制
相較於亞洲鄰近國家食療產業的蓬勃發展,我國應因各方對「藥食同源」清單意見分歧而使法規修訂陷入停滯。
建議:
-
-
- 確立「藥食同源」清單定期更新機制:確立每兩年一次的更新頻率,確保與區域標準一致之法規彈性,並以「風險分級管理」取代「全面禁止」。
- 擴大參考國際風險為基礎之標準:建議針對中國、日本及韓國等已列入「藥食同源」目錄之品項,可採取「風險分級管理」,非全面禁止。若有個別原料之補充說明,可用「合理限制用量食品原料(標示警語)」,增加彈性。
- 導入「產業衝擊評估報告」:量化原料納入後對食品加工業(如機能性飲料、即食膳食)的預計產值貢獻,正面驅動打破「防弊大於興利」的僵局,產業共利。
-
2.4 建議食品添加物使用限量文字及其與原料來源之營養素限量一致
現行《食品添加物使用範圍及限量暨規格標準》第八類《營養添加劑》中針對一般食品的使用限量文字不一致,易造成解讀上的歧異;此外,營養添加劑之使用限量亦常與提供相同營養素之食品原料使用限量不一致(如,鋅、硒、鐵、鎂及鉬等營養素)。為提升法規一致性與明確性,並保障消費者權益,建議如下:
(1) 限量文字表述一致化:
建議刪除「每日食用限量」中之「限」字,改為「每日食用量」或「每日食用建議量」,以避免語意不一致造成誤解,提升法規之清晰與明確性。
(2) 營養添加劑與提供相同營養素之食品原料限量協調:
例如,鋅酵母原料之使用限量為每日食用量中鋅之總含量不得高於30毫克,食品添加物第八類營養添加劑編號068硫酸鋅之使用限量為每日食用量中鋅之總含量不得高於22.5毫克。除有特殊食用安全性之考量外,應採一致性規範,提供相同營養素之營養添加劑與食品原料採一致的限量規範,以利業者遵循並保障消費者權益。
建議三:促進政府治理數位化、透明化與國際接軌
3.1 以電子化流程取代紙本要求,以增進數位治理及效率
本委員會感謝農業部去年積極回應所提建議並於此議題取得進展,即規劃於今年建立網站,接受有機農產品進口同意文件的線上申請。我們希望今年能有更多的成果,以提升相關申請程序的效率。
3.2 推動跨境零售商品通關流程之電子化
台灣政府持續推動治理與經濟的數位化,數位發展部亦積極推動電子簽章制度。電子簽章可強化線上程序的安全性與效率,對提升跨境零售與供應鏈效率至關重要。然而,目前多項通關程序仍以紙本為主,部分現行線上流程因要求自然人憑證等限制,實際上仍具高度門檻,增加民眾負擔並延長行政時程。建議政府協調相關機關,優先推動以下流程的數位化:
(1) 清關長期委任(關務署):紙本授權造成文件往返與時程延宕,導入電子簽章可提升效率與資料安全。
(2) 高劑量營養保健食品自用切結(食藥署) 及藍牙等無線通訊設備自用聲明(國家通訊傳播委員會):若能以電子簽章辦理,可簡化流程並提升行政效率,同時維持監管要求。
建議政府推動跨機關一致性應用電子簽章與無紙化作業,以落實數位化政策、強化貿易便利化並提升民眾參與數位經濟的整體體驗。
3.3 禁止銷售被移除或竄改原廠產製批號的進口酒精飲料
本委員會持續尋求解決這一長期影響消費者安全的問題。關鍵在於,《菸酒管理法》第32條明確規定,市面銷售的包裝酒精產品必須帶有產製批號 - 該批號載明該產品為在特定生產線上於特定時間生產的特定產品。
部分平行輸入商持續移除原廠產製批號,並以自行編列的序號取而代之,然而這些序號並不包含溯源所需的必要資訊。
本委員會一再提出國際間許多國家對產製批號標示的規範。英國、法國、義大利、加拿大和歐盟都強制要求酒精產品必須帶有原廠產製批號。目前尚未禁止移除批號的國家,也正在討論修改相關法律。
此外,禁止移除原廠產製批號並不違背自由貿易的精神。只要進口商依照法律規定保留瓶身上的原始批號,就可以繼續進口酒類產品。
我們認為,當食品或酒類安全出現問題時,酒類產品的可追溯性和可召回性至關重要。為了維護消費者權益,我們再次建請財政部:
(1) 進行系統性檢查,依法禁止被移除產製批號之產品在市場上銷售;
(2) 建立健全有效的通報管理機制,取代目前在海關進口時的「自主申報」做法。
3.4 提升新興食品原料審查之透明度與程序可預測性
本委員會肯定食藥署針對此議題持續與業界溝通,然而,目前新興食品原料申請案件審查時程長且作業不透明情形未有改善,資料評估、原料安全性評估、提送諮議會審查等各階段耗時且未訂有處理期限,審查作業中有誤(如,預計應用之食品範圍遺漏)時,申請人亦無從及時提出,以致業界在規劃應用新興食品原料於食品時,有不必要的延宕,進而延後新產品上市,甚至可能降低業者投資新興食品原料研發之意願。
本委員會建議食藥署精進現行作業以:
(1) 改善審查作業的可預期性:訂定案件審查各階段工作處理期限,並建立可供業界查詢審查狀態之系統,提升行政作業之可預期性與透明度。
(2) 針對國際上已准用之原料,加速審查作業並一年內完成評估:如美國食品藥物管理局「一般公認安全(GRAS)」准用之原料,可減少非必要之評估工作,一年內完成審查作業,以提升效率、有助於業界順利引進創新的食品原料。
精進審查作業的效率與可預期性,有助於支持食品科技創新、促進貿易,並打造更與國際接軌、高效的法規監管環境。
建議四:部署新興年齡驗證技術,負責任地開放受管制商品之線上市場
隨著台灣積極推動數位服務發展,並接軌全球人工智慧部署趨勢,相關法規框架亦應與時俱進。本委員會建議,凡是為類比時代技術限制所制定、如今已阻礙更有效數位防護措施落地的法規,均應予以適時修訂。
自數位發展部於 2022 年成立以來,台灣已建立完善的數位身分驗證基礎建設,能夠大規模進行安全、可稽核的遠端身分驗證。技術可行性已不再是當前的政策挑戰,核心問題在於法規的適應與調整。以《菸酒管理法》第 30 條對酒類與菸草產品線上銷售及配送之限制為例,該條文源於過去年齡驗證能力不足的時代背景,旨在防止無法有效核實年齡的交易情形發生。然而,隨著年齡驗證技術的大幅躍進,在保護未成年人與支持數位產業發展之間,已無需再做非此即彼的取捨,在技術上兩者兼顧已然可行。
保護未成年人從來不只是政府的責任,負責任的企業同樣視此為己任。數位創新與未成年人之福祉並非相互對立的目標,而是相輔相成的政策方向。現行禁止措施隱含對業者的不信任,預設企業無力或不願承擔保護未成年人的責任,從而在促進產業發展與保障弱勢族群之間,製造虛假的二元對立。此種不信任態度,阻礙了公私協力開發解決方案的可能性;然而,此類協作本可在現有基礎之上,進一步強化對未成年人的保護。
現代驗證技術重新定義企業的角色,讓其從被動受管對象,成為與政府攜手共同肩負保護未成年人責任的夥伴。此一模式已在國際實踐中獲得驗證:涵蓋線上證件核查與配送時當面確認的多層次數位驗證機制,其保護效果實可超越傳統零售模式下,單憑店員個人判斷的查核方式。舉例來說,日本允許線上酒類銷售,透過建立相應的授權框架,要求業者於購買過程中加入年齡驗證程序,並視情況於配送時執行額外證件查核。日本之案例顯示,經妥善規範的數位通路,足以兼顧保護未成年人及支持合法商業活動的健全發展。
為此,本委員會敦促政府善用現有技術能力,採取以下具體措施:
- 核准專案試驗計畫:於指定縣市啟動試點,測試數位年齡驗證機制之有效性,並蒐集合規結果的實證數據。計畫應訂定明確的成效衡量指標與各方認可的評估期程,並於試行結果驗證達標後,循序推動擴大實施。
- 建立例外許可框架:允許業者於符合政府核定之年齡驗證技術標準的前提下,申請豁免現行法規限制(例如《菸酒管理法》第 30 條),從而建立以技術能力為基準的彈性監管框架。
建議五:取消對乾燥寵物食品之非必要檢疫規定
儘管經過擠壓(extrusion)與經包膜的乾燥寵物食品被視為安全的商品,主管機關目前仍以禽流感相關風險為由,對某些擠壓乾燥寵物食品的進口實施檢疫。根據國際慣例,無論出口國家或地區的禽流感致病性狀態,動物檢疫當局都不宜就上述產品設置任何與禽流感相關的進口條件限制。台灣作為世界動物衛生組織(WOAH)的會員,既已承諾履行其會員職責,應當制定合理檢疫規定以避免貿易障礙。
本委員會建議農業部遵守其修正相關法規的承諾,並移除對乾燥犬/貓食不必要的檢疫要求,增加國際貿易效率與有效利用檢疫量能。
