The Committee appreciates the government’s attention to the recommendations outlined in the 2025 Taiwan White Paper and its continued engagement on key policy issues. In particular, the committee appreciates the continuing discussion on two outstanding items: allowing foreign bank subsidiaries and branches in Taiwan to support their overseas group entities in providing cross-border financial services and expanding the application scope of the operating rules governing security measures for financial institutions using electronic signature mechanisms. While these issues remain unresolved, the Committee welcomes the continued dialogue and has reiterated these recommendations this year.
In addition to these two continuing priorities, this year’s White Paper highlights a new area for consideration. This is easing restrictions on the use of proceeds and issuance caps for New Taiwan dollar financial debentures issued by foreign bank branches in Taiwan.
Timely progress on these three issues would support further liberalization of Taiwan’s financial sector and enhance its attractiveness as a regional financial hub. Advancing these reforms would also encourage greater participation by foreign institutions and strengthen the competitiveness and long-term development of Taiwan’s financial industry.
Suggestion 1: Allow foreign banks to support Taiwanese multinational corporations in accessing cross-border financial services.
In the current global environment, Taiwanese multinational corporations (MNCs) must continuously adjust their international strategies in response to geopolitical and economic developments. Such adjustments include establishing overseas operations and financial networks to support cross-border payments, capital movements, and financing needs. Timely access to integrated financial services is therefore critical to maintaining their global competitiveness.
However, Taiwanese MNCs face practical challenges when entering new markets, including time zone differences, language barriers, and unfamiliarity with local regulatory and financial systems. In some jurisdictions, Taiwanese banks have limited or no presence, while in others their service offerings may not fully meet the operational needs of MNCs. As a result, many Taiwanese companies rely on international banks with global networks to support their overseas activities.
Foreign bank subsidiaries and branches in Taiwan play an important role in this process by serving as a point of contact for Taiwanese MNCs. Through coordination with their overseas affiliates, these institutions can facilitate access to cross-border financial services and support clients in establishing relationships with financial institutions in other jurisdictions and in providing ongoing assistance in client identification and verification, document handling, information handling and other non-transaction support functions. Such arrangements and assistance are consistent with common international banking practices, under which financial institutions assist clients in connecting with affiliated entities across markets.
Under the current regulatory framework, however, foreign bank subsidiaries and branches in Taiwan face restrictions in facilitating and assisting their overseas affiliates in certain client-related activities. Official letters issued in 2010 and 2014 limit the ability of these institutions to support client onboarding or account opening for overseas entities without prior regulatory approval. While we understand that these measures may be necessary to prevent unregulated solicitation of offshore deposits and capital outflows, in practice their application also constrains the ability of Taiwanese MNCs to efficiently establish and effectively utilize overseas financial arrangements necessary for their operations.
In many cases, the assistance provided by foreign banks in Taiwan is limited to administrative and client service functions performed at the request of the client, while the underlying financial services are conducted offshore by appropriately licensed entities. Such activities are distinct from deposit-taking or financial intermediation conducted in Taiwan and are comparable to the cooperation permitted between domestic banks and their overseas branches in support of customer due diligence and account management processes.
The committee looks forward to continuing to work with the authorities to achieve permission for foreign bank subsidiaries and branches in Taiwan to assist their overseas affiliates providing cross-border financial services to Taiwan MNC clients without prior approval while at the same time putting in place regulatory oversight and internal controls that address regulatory concerns regarding unregulated solicitation of capital outflows or other financial abuses. Such assistance may include client identification and verification, document handling, information collection, and other non-transactional support functions. Enabling these activities would facilitate the development of cross-border financial networks for Taiwanese enterprises while maintaining regulatory safeguards.
Suggestion 2: Ease restrictions on the use of proceeds and issuance caps for NTD financial debentures issued by foreign bank branches in Taiwan.
Since the promulgation of the “Regulations Governing the Issuance of New Taiwan Dollar Financial Bonds by Branches of Foreign Banks in Taiwan” in 2018, key restrictions on the use of proceeds and total issuance limits have remained unchanged. Under Article 4, proceeds are limited to financing for major infrastructure projects, offshore wind power, other green energy industries, or sustainable economic activities designated by the Financial Supervisory Commission. Article 7 further stipulates that total issuance by a foreign bank branch may not exceed eight times its net worth in Taiwan.
These restrictions limit the ability of foreign bank branches to support the broader financing needs of Taiwanese enterprises. In particular, the exclusion of general corporate lending, including working capital and trade finance, and other general corporate purposes loans, does not reflect the primary funding needs of local businesses. However, the Taiwan branches lack a stable source of medium/long-term New Taiwan dollar (NTD) funding, and therefore rely mainly on shortterm funds — such as term deposits and interbank borrowings — to finance medium/long term NTD loans. At the same time, financial debentures have become an important component of foreign bank branches’ capital strategies, providing stable medium- to long-term local currency funding to support lending activities and fulfill liquidity ratio imposed by the Central Bank and internal medium- and long-term liquidity guidelines.
To address these constraints, the Committee recommends the following:
2.1 Expand the permitted use of proceeds to include general corporate lending. Article 4 be amended to allow proceeds to be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital, trade finance, and capital expenditures. This would better align regulatory policy with the financing needs of Taiwanese enterprises; and
2.2 Increase flexibility in issuance limits for NTD financial debentures. Article 7 be amended to change the cap from a fixed cap of 8 times net worth to a range, such as “8-15 times,” and then allow the Financial Supervisory Commission to adjust limits within that range based on macroprudential conditions.
While maintaining appropriate prudential oversight, these amendments would enable foreign bank branches to more effectively support corporate financing needs, deepen the local NTD bond market, and align Taiwan’s regulatory framework with international practices.
Suggestion 3: Continue to relax restrictions on the use of electronic signatures in financial services.
Recent regulatory developments have resulted in a more complete legal framework for the use of electronic signatures in Taiwan. The Legislative Yuan passed amendments to the Electronic Signatures Act on April 30, 2024, which were promulgated on May 15, 2024, affirming the legal equivalence of electronic records and signatures. Previously, the Ministry of Digital Affairs in 2022 had assumed responsibility for implementation of digital signature regulations and has since issued interpretations to support financial digitalization. In addition, the Bankers Association of the Republic of China has introduced operating rules to support the use of electronic signatures in financial institutions.
However, inconsistencies remain between the operating rules and the Electronic Signature Act. While the Act affirms that electronic signatures should have the same legal effect as handwritten signatures when statutory requirements are met, the current operating rules limit the scope of permissible applications to specific transaction types defined under the guidelines for security measures of financial institutions for electronic banking services. As raised in our prior White Paper suggestions, these additional restrictions create uncertainty for banks and constrain the broader use of electronic signatures in practice.
Electronic signatures are widely used across industries, including by multinational corporations that rely on digital tools to execute financial and commercial transactions. Current requirements, such as obtaining written consent verified by company seals and defining the scope of application in advance reduce operational efficiency and limit the flexibility of digital processes.
Given that banks are already required to conduct risk assessments and establish internal control mechanisms when offering electronic signature services, the Committee continues to recommend that regulatory restrictions on permissible application scenarios be relaxed. Banks and customers should be allowed to mutually determine the appropriate scope of electronic signature use in their dealings subject to adequate risk management.
Relaxing these restrictions would reduce regulatory inconsistency, enhance operational flexibility, and support the continued development of Taiwan’s digital economy while maintaining appropriate safeguards.
感謝政府關注去年銀行業委員會所提的建議。列於去年度白皮書中之議題「放寬《金融機構使用電子簽名機制安全控管作業規範》之適用範圍」以及「允許在臺外銀子行及分行協助其境外集團成員針對跨境金融服務提供相關協助」,因未完全解決,但仍與主管機關當局持續討論中,本年度將再度提出。
除上述兩項議題外,今年度的白皮書也將聚焦於一項新議題:放寬外國銀行在臺分行發行新臺幣金融債券之資金使用範圍與發行總額上限限制。
我們相信上述目標能於明年獲得改善,綜觀金融監督管理委員會(金管會)擴展金融市場及增加就業機會之目標,委員會期盼主管機關持續鬆綁相關法規,以吸引更多香港、新加坡等鄰近金融市場的商機轉向台灣,同時提升金融產業的競爭力,並增進人才留任和產業發展之能力。
建議一: 允許在臺外銀子分行協助其境外集團成員就台灣跨國企業客戶提供跨境金融服務
隨著當前地緣政治及對等關稅議題,台灣跨國企業為保持其國際競爭性,須即時因應國際政經情勢調整其全球化佈局,並迅速建置海外金融服務脈絡,以因應其海外設廠、營運所產生之收付款、資金調度及融資需求。
台灣跨國企業於進入各國不同市場時,常因時差、語言,或對當地金融法規、體系及文化不熟悉而無法迅速取得當地市場之金融服務,有些市場(例如墨西哥)甚至無本國銀行之海外分支機構提供服務。即便本國銀行設有據點之市場,國際性銀行所提供之金融服務仍與國銀有所區隔(例如,國銀海外分支機構以提供聯貸為主,而國際性銀行係以提供客戶營運資金週轉與調度之服務為主),為取得完整之金融服務,台灣跨國企業亦須使用國際性銀行之金融服務。故企業客戶期望能借重在臺外銀子分行作為聯絡窗口,與外銀所屬集團之境外聯行、區域總部及總行等集團成員協調,以協助取得相關跨境金融服務,以利海外營運周轉及台灣總部進行資金統籌調度等需求。
相較於本國銀行,在臺外銀子分行為台灣企業之所提供之特有服務價值,乃是運用遍布全球之跨國網絡優勢、專業知識、資本基礎、信貸資源及品牌信譽,協助台灣客戶拓展業務版圖,例如:透過外銀之全球網銀系統,可協助台灣跨國企業台灣總部掌握其全球資金狀況,迅速進行資金統籌調度,以利其立足台灣管理全球業務。如在臺外銀之從業人員得協助及支援客戶與隸屬同一集團之國外金融機構建立往來關係,應有助於台灣企業跨國營運所需金融服務之順利進行,亦有助於提升在臺外銀子分行於集團內之整體貢獻度。
由法人客戶所在地之金融從業人員協助客戶於隸屬於同集團之海外聯行或關係企業開戶,亦與國際金融市場之實務相符。舉例而言,跨國企業集團來台投資時,因不熟悉台灣之金融市場及相關要求,也須借助外銀總部或國外分支機構之從業人員,與在臺外銀子分行聯繫,加速取得金融服務。而在臺外銀亦須借助總行或集團之境外分子行對該外資熟悉之人員協助落實認識客戶(Know Your Customer, KYC)審查作業並進行開戶等事宜。
惟參民國99年8月24日金管銀外字第09950002320號及103年3月27日金管銀外字第10350001020號等函,在臺外銀子分行不得代為確認客戶身分或其他方式供其總行、或總行所轄在我國境外所有分支機構或關係企業、或其他未經主管機關核准之外國機構,於我國境內招攬我國客戶開立海外存款帳戶或吸收資金。上述函令之規範意旨,係為防範外國機構未經許可於境內招攬客戶或吸收資金,此與台灣跨國企業因全球化佈局之需求,須建立海外金融網路之性質實有不同。且查,台灣跨國企業之對外投資行為,事前皆須經過我國政府機構(經濟部、央行)之事前核准,而其境外帳戶之設置,也是為了實際款項收付或建廠等需求,與前揭函令擬防杜國人資金外流之情形有別。
且查,即便在臺外銀子分行應客戶要求而提供相關協助,如在臺外銀子分行人員未涉及勸誘、推介或行銷境外金融服務或執行相關交易,則主要之境外金融服務仍於境外由境外金融人員執行,在臺外銀子分行相關之協助及支援等服務,本質仍屬境外金融服務之延伸,而與《銀行法》第29條所規定之非銀行在臺經營收受存款等情形有別。
另,目前法令亦允許本國銀行國內營業單位與海外分支機構間得相互協助辦理存款與授信業務所需之資料蒐集、傳遞、核對親簽、核對正本等作業,及客戶資料更新、印鑑變更或靜止戶恢復往來等作業,以協助落實執行KYC審查作業等事宜。在臺外銀子分行亟願與國內金融同業共同努力,全力襄助台灣跨國企業全球化佈局所需之國際金融服務需求。
本委員會建議在主管機關合理監管,並在建立適當內部控制及管理措施下,開放在臺外銀子分行協助其境外聯行、區域總部及總行等集團成員,對於台灣跨國企業客戶(包括既有法人客戶、與既有法人客戶隸屬同一企業集團之法人戶及其供應鏈廠商,及其他有實質營運需求之台灣跨國企業客戶),提供跨境金融服務之相關協助,包括辦理存款與授信業務所需資料蒐集、文件傳遞、人別驗證、核對簽樣、核對正本、翻譯協助、客戶資料更新、簽樣更新、落實執行KYC審查作業(包含首次KYC及更新作業),以及未涉及交易推介或交易執行之客戶服務協調溝通服務,以利我國跨國企業客戶得更有效率建立全球化佈局所需之跨境金融網絡。
建議二: 放寬外國銀行在臺分行發行新臺幣金融債券之資金使用範圍與發行總額上限限制
「外國銀行在臺分行發行新臺幣金融債券辦法」自 2018 年發布以來,迄今尚未對「所募集資金之使用範圍」與「發行債券總額上限」兩項限制進行修訂;亦即第 4 條有關募集資金的使用範圍僅限於我國境內重大公共建設、離岸風電或其他綠能產業之相關融資,或主管機關所定之「永續經濟活動」之相關融資,以及第 7 條有關外國銀行在臺分行(下稱在臺分行)在臺之發行新臺幣金融債券金額加計前已發行流通在外之餘額不得超過其淨值之八倍。
上述「資金之使用範圍」限制排除普通公司之營運資金貸款(包括營運資金、貿易融資以及其他一般企業用途之放款),然此類貸款正係台灣企業與在臺分行業務往來所提融資需求的主要部分,惟在臺分行並無穩定之中長期新臺幣資金來源,故大多以短期資金(如定存、同業間拆借)來支應中長期之新臺幣放款。就在臺分行而言,發行新臺幣金融債券募集資金已成為在臺分行在台資金策略的重要基石之一,因其提供在臺分行所需的穩定且具中長期之新臺幣資金,將有利於在臺分行強化中央銀行所規定的流動性風險管理以及內部政策有關中長期流動性指引的要求。為消弭多年以來的瓶頸限制,建議對上述辦法進行以下修正:
- 在第 4 條新增「一般公司營運資金」之第三類使用範圍,允許以新臺幣發行之債券資金之使用範圍及於營運資金、貿易融資及資本支出等普通企業貸款;
- 將第 7 條的發行總額上限乘數由淨值之8 倍提升至淨值之12 倍,並增設彈性區間(例如 8 ~ 15 倍),讓金管會得以依宏觀審慎指標於每年或視情事需要調整。
在保持適當審慎監管的同時,上述修正將使外國銀行在臺分行能更有效支援企業融資需求,深化本地新臺幣債券市場,並使台灣的監管框架與國際慣例保持一致。
建議三: 放寬《金融機構使用電子簽名機制安全控管作業規範》之適用範圍
因應金融電子化及無紙化的需求,數位發展部自2022年8月成立以來,已採納歐洲商會之建議於2022年12月2日發佈「具電子簽章效力之電子簽章技術」函釋(數位發展部數位產業署產經字第1114000229號函),銀行公會亦依銀行局之指導,於2024年3月發佈《金融機構使用電子簽名機制安全控管作業規範》(下稱作業規範),協助銀行推動提供客戶以電子簽名線上簽署電子文件,有助於促進數位經濟之發展,並與國際上常見之演算法與資通安全技術標準接軌。
惟自前揭作業規範訂定後,數位發展部積極依立法程序研議修訂之《電子簽章法》,業順利經立法院通過,並已於2024年5月15日公布施行,配套之「電子簽章法施行細則」,亦由數位發展部於2024年11月14日發布施行,至此,電子簽章已有完善且更新的法律規範。
基此,上述作業規範與現行之《電子簽章法》暨其施行細則,即發生規範隔閡之情形,例如,依據作業規範第2條及第5條規定,簽名私鑰儲存於客戶端或銀行端(含第三方平臺)者得辦理申請指示類業務,而申請指示類業務的範圍為「金融機構辦理電子銀行業務安全控管作業基準」(下稱安控基準)電子轉帳及交易指示類之申請指示所列示之服務項目。此與《電子簽章法》第4 條「電子文件及電子簽章,符合本法規定者,在功能上等同於實體文件及簽章,不得僅因其電子形式而否認其法律效力。」與同法第5條:「文件及簽章之使用,得以電子文件及電子簽章為之。依法令規定應以書面為之者,其內容可完整呈現,並可於日後取出供查驗者,得以電子文件為之。依法令規定應簽名或蓋章者,得以電子簽章為之。前三項文件或簽章之使用有相對人者,除相對人已同意採用電子形式外,應於採用電子形式之前,以合理期間及方式給予相對人反對之機會,並告知相對人未反對者,推定同意採用電子形式。前項之相對人得隨時表示停止採用電子形式。但其表示停止前已依電子形式所為之法律行為,其效力不受影響。」即產生規範方式之落差,反增添銀行於確認應用場景之不確定因素。
此外,除了銀行業之外,數位技術之應用亦廣泛存在於其他不同產業,尤其是大型跨國科技企業與集團,其自身亦已使用符合國際規範之電子簽章平台應用於國際間金融商業文件之簽署,因此在考量作業規範規定時,除了目前作業規範已規定銀行提供客戶以電子簽名線上簽署電子文件應取得客戶書面同意以下事項:(1)以電子簽名線上簽署電子文件之、(2) 同意指派電子文件簽署人及/或電子簽名授權人員。前述書面同意應加蓋公司及負責人印鑑以供銀行核驗。同時,銀行與客戶約定使用電子簽名時,應取得客戶使用電子文件簽署文件的範圍之同意。
鑒於銀行提供本項服務應針對業務及客戶進行風險評估,訂定申請資格與管控機制,且相關的控管作業應足以確認客戶的意思表示,建議不再以作業規範限制申請指示類僅以安控基準明定的項目為準,而改由銀行與客戶自行約定簽署文件的範圍,包括但不限於申請指示類或交易指示類業務,藉以改善規範衝突之情形,並持續對於促進數位經濟之發展有正面的助益。
