2025 Taiwan White Paper
Overview
BUILDING A SHOCK-PROOF TAIWAN
Global trade and geopolitics in 2025 remain marked by profound uncertainty. Geoeconomic competition and heightened strategic tensions have reshaped the operating environment for multinational companies. Meanwhile, governments are reevaluating trade and industrial policies to reflect shifting priorities in national security, economic self-reliance, and technological leadership.
Against this backdrop, Taiwan’s economic stability, democratic governance, and leadership in critical industries continue to position it as a trusted and strategic partner. As one of the world’s wealthiest economies by net financial assets per capita, Taiwan plays an outsized role in the global economy. Outstandingly, it is the leading producer of advanced semiconductors, accounting for more than 90% of cutting-edge chip manufacturing.
Taiwan consistently ranks among the top jurisdictions worldwide for patent applications and innovation output. Its high-tech industries, robust export performance, and strong rule of law have made it a cornerstone of global supply chains and an essential partner in sectors ranging from electronics and healthcare to green energy and artificial intelligence. However, staying competitive in this evolving global landscape will require flexible and forward-looking policy formation.
Over the past year, the government has intensified its efforts to bolster Taiwan’s ability to withstand disruptions and navigate an increasingly uncertain world. In a notable show of commitment, President Lai Ching-te has established three new interrelated committees under the Presidential Office, connected by the theme of national resilience: the National Climate Change, Healthy Taiwan Promotion, and Whole-of-Society Defense Resilience Committees.
These high-level bodies signal a comprehensive approach to fortifying Taiwan’s future by integrating climate strategy, public health, and defense preparedness into a cohesive framework. Strengthening Taiwan to proactively deal with challenges and deepen cooperation with the international community helps institutionalize resilience as the guiding principle of national policy. This outlook sets the tone for Taiwan’s strategic priorities in 2025 and beyond, with an emphasis on reinforcing critical systems, preserving economic vitality, and enhancing partnerships with like-minded nations.
Beyond resilience, Taiwan is increasingly positioned to help shape global solutions and set new standards across strategic sectors. The 2025 Taiwan White Paper reflects this ambition, with committee chapters highlighting Taiwan’s leadership in areas such as digital regulation, semiconductor policy, and intellectual property reform.
Businesses play an indispensable role in building both societal resilience and prosperity. As employers, innovators, and providers of essential goods and services, companies support livelihoods, public health, and national security. They also serve as pivotal partners in infrastructure development, digital transformation, and environmental sustainability. Their investments generate growth while helping Taiwan remain agile and resilient in the face of global shocks. Therefore, including industry in national efforts to bolster resilience and ensure future competitiveness is essential.
Over the past year, Taiwan has made headway in areas such as stakeholder engagement, digital transformation, infrastructure development, and healthcare planning. But progress has been uneven, and high-level commitments have yet to yield consistent, measurable results.
Of the 97 issues identified in the 2024 Taiwan White Paper, 9 have been fully resolved. While 25% of issues raised in 2023 showed some advancement – either resolved or indicating good progress – just 10% did so among those raised in 2024. Roughly half remain under observation, and a quarter are stalled or unaddressed. More decisive action is needed to fortify Taiwan’s long-term competitiveness and systemic stability.
As global trade tensions mount and geopolitical risks intensify, Taiwan faces growing pressure to prove itself as an open, adaptable, and globally competitive economy. Beyond supporting Taiwan’s whole-of-society resilience agenda, the practical recommendations from AmCham’s industry committees remain essential to strengthening the business climate and sustaining investor confidence.
Aligning Taiwan’s regulatory framework with international standards remains an instrumental step in enhancing national and economic resilience. As global supply chains become increasingly scrutinized and cross-border operations more complex, a predictable, transparent, and internationally harmonized regulatory environment will strengthen Taiwan’s ability to attract high-quality investment and sustain its influential role in global commerce.
At the same time, Taiwan should actively pursue opportunities to lead in regulatory innovation, particularly in sectors where it holds a global advantage – such as semiconductors – and in emerging fields where it seeks to build competitiveness, including renewable energy and digital technologies. By establishing clear, forward-looking benchmarks, Taiwan can bolster its reputation as a standards-setting, globally minded economy.
AmCham committees continue to highlight areas where Taiwan’s regulatory practices diverge from international expectations, posing operational challenges for multinational enterprises. By adopting global best practices, Taiwan can ensure that its regulatory systems are adaptable, credible, and conducive to long-term economic security.
REGULATORY MODERNIZATION
Regulatory alignment with international standards has long been one of the Chamber’s most consistent recommendations. Yet critical gaps persist in areas such as safe harbor principles for digital platforms, timely stakeholder consultation, and predictable review processes for healthcare technologies. Taiwan’s frameworks often lag behind global best practices, creating compliance risks and delaying access to innovation.
Adequate public notice of proposed regulations – along with a platform for stakeholder feedback – is a cornerstone of good regulatory practice. Transparent processes that prioritize accountability and invite meaningful public input are essential to preserving the integrity of governance. Notice-and-comment procedures must be supported by meaningful communication as implementation details are finalized. When followed faithfully, this process strengthens outcomes and builds trust among regulators, businesses, and the public.
Taiwan’s 60-day notice-and-comment mechanism, introduced in 2016 at AmCham’s urging, was a welcome step forward but has fallen short in practice. Many regulations are implemented without sufficient notice, largely due to the narrow scope of the executive orders, which restrict the rule’s application to international trade, investment, or intellectual property. As a result, domestic rules with significant cross-border implications are excluded.
Further undermining the process is an exemption allowing the rule to be bypassed in “emergency” situations. Frequent invocation of this clause has eroded its legitimacy. AmCham urges the government to clarify the definition of emergencies, eliminate the trade-related carveout, and strengthen oversight to preserve the rule’s intent.
Reinforcing the 60-day consultation period as a universal requirement – paired with early publication of bilingual versions and standardized proposal templates – would make the process more open, predictable, and inclusive. The Chamber has raised these concerns with the National Development Council, emphasizing the need for rigorous implementation of consultation protocols.
Unlike in the United States, where legislation often originates in Congress, most bills in Taiwan are drafted within the Executive Yuan. Applying the 60-day consultation period during the drafting stage would improve regulatory quality. Early involvement of AmCham members and other international stakeholders would ensure new rules reflect practical industry insight.
Ongoing dialogue with foreign businesses can enrich policymaking, drawing on global expertise and proven benchmarks to strengthen Taiwan’s regulatory foundation. Their participation supports regulatory transparency, alignment with international norms, and Taiwan’s reputation as a stable, attractive investment destination.
AmCham calls on the Executive Yuan to prioritize rulemaking reforms, including strict adherence to the 60-day comment period and broader application beyond trade- or intellectual property-related regulations. Overuse of the emergency exception undermines transparency. More inclusive legislative drafting, supported by bilingual drafts and early-stage stakeholder briefings, would significantly improve regulatory outcomes.
WHOLE-OF-SOCIETY IMPLEMENTATION
Building a more antifragile Taiwan will require broader improvements across the economy, including:
Critical infrastructure. Critical infrastructure resilience remains fundamental to Taiwan’s economic security, technological leadership, and societal stability. The Chamber urges the government to take a more coordinated, future-oriented approach to reinforcing digital, energy, and communications infrastructure. The Executive Yuan should consider establishing a cross-agency task force to identify infrastructure bottlenecks, streamline planning and procurement, and align infrastructure development with national resilience goals.
Taiwan must prioritize modernization of its grid infrastructure, particularly through investments in energy storage, demand response systems, and renewable integration. A transparent, cost-reflective pricing mechanism is essential to enable efficient procurement and sustained investment in energy infrastructure. Infrastructure resilience also depends on reforming public procurement processes to improve administrative efficiency, prevent retroactive requirements, and minimize project delays.
Digital infrastructure – including internet data centers and cloud service providers – forms the backbone of Taiwan’s AI-driven transformation. To safeguard national assets and digital sovereignty, Taiwan must implement robust cybersecurity protections, such as Zero Trust Architecture, and adopt secure cloud procurement policies aligned with international standards.
Telecommunications infrastructure must also be strengthened. The Chamber reiterates its recommendation for government acquisition of a dedicated submarine cable repair vessel to address recent repeated cable disruptions. The creation of unified access and usage guidelines for public infrastructure assets, such as utility poles, rooftops, or underground conduits, would establish clear, consistent rules for how telecom providers can access shared infrastructure. This would in turn help accelerate 5G rollout and enhance network resilience, particularly in underserved areas.
Taken together, these actions will help Taiwan develop an integrated, future-proof infrastructure system that can withstand both chronic and acute shocks while supporting national development and cross-sector competitiveness.
Defense. In national defense and economic security, Taiwan must continue balancing strategic autonomy with openness to international cooperation. The Lai administration’s commitment to raising annual defense spending to at least 3% of GDP is a commendable example of sustained action.
AmCham Taiwan supports efforts to strengthen Taiwan’s domestic defense capabilities but is concerned about recent changes to the government’s Industrial Cooperation Policy, which could discourage foreign companies from participating. Specifically, the rules are unclear about what kinds of investments or technology-sharing companies are expected to provide in return for defense contracts (commonly known as offsets). The policy currently excludes indirect contributions – such as training, research partnerships, or local supply chain development – and asks for commitments before contracts are finalized, which increases risk and uncertainty for potential partners.
The Chamber urges a recalibrated approach that offers predictability, safeguards commercial viability, and encourages long-term investment in Taiwan’s defense-industrial base. Recommendations include reinstating a minimum offset percentage, introducing limited indirect offsets aligned with national priorities, and ensuring confidentiality in offset cost disclosures. Additionally, offset agreements should be timed to coincide with final contract execution under the U.S. Foreign Military Sales framework to reduce pre-award risk.
Beyond procurement, Taiwan’s defense resilience depends on strengthening dual-use supply chains. The Chamber supports ongoing efforts to localize the production of key components, diversify suppliers, and improve cybersecurity standards for defense-related ICT systems. Close cooperation between the private sector and national security agencies will be essential to identify vulnerabilities and implement cost-effective safeguards.
Digital policy. Taiwan has made commendable strides toward becoming an AI island and is laying the groundwork for quantum technology development. Government investment in edge computing and AI data infrastructure has positioned Taiwan to lead in high-performance applications and smart manufacturing. However, the absence of clear, risk-based regulations for AI deployment, overlapping agency oversight, and inconsistent treatment of cloud infrastructure hinder private sector participation.
Committee recommendations in this year’s White Paper emphasize the need for a centralized digital governance framework under the Executive Yuan to harmonize the fragmented regulatory landscape. A principles-based supervision model is fundamental for emerging technologies such as AI, where over-regulation could stifle innovation while under-regulation exposes Taiwan to reputational and security risks. Specifically, AmCham industry committees have called for safe harbor protections for intermediaries, adoption of the Manila Principles on Intermediary Liability, and enhanced due process for user data requests. Without urgent reforms, Taiwan risks undermining both its democratic credibility and digital competitiveness.
The Chamber also highlights growing concern among international cloud service providers about infrastructure cost burdens and regulatory uncertainty. Changes to electricity pricing and the lack of tailored policies for data centers may deter future investment in Taiwan’s cloud ecosystem. AmCham recommends developing a long-term national strategy for internet data centers, including performance-based standards for cybersecurity, sustainability, and grid integration.
Energy and infrastructure. Clean energy is central to the economy of the future. Although the government has taken steps to improve the renewable energy permitting process, stabilize electricity pricing, and modernize procurement practices, implementation delays and fragmented oversight still undermine investor confidence. Policy inconsistency, such as sudden changes to local content requirements or auction rules, has led some companies to pause or withdraw investment plans.
The Chamber reiterates its recommendations to streamline approval processes, improve regulatory transparency, and ensure fair market access for foreign contractors. Cross-ministerial coordination remains inadequate, especially for large-scale renewable energy and grid projects. Establishing a centralized platform to coordinate between central and local authorities, along with project-specific technical task forces, would greatly enhance execution.
The Chamber commends and supports Taiwan’s goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 and notes that within the renewable energy space, grid congestion and uncertainty around transmission capacity continue to delay project deployment. Developers have cited the absence of a clear and enforceable queueing system for grid access. Furthermore, the energy storage system market, once viewed as a pillar of grid resilience, is now suffering from pricing volatility and unclear investment signals. The Chamber urges the Ministry of Economic Affairs to adopt a more transparent and predictable framework for storage participation in ancillary services markets, including time-bound targets, baseline pricing models, and auction design reform.
Healthcare. Taiwan has made admirable strides toward a more open and collaborative regulatory environment in the healthcare sphere. The creation of the new presidential-level Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee has provided a valuable forum for dialogue, and the Chamber acknowledges growing receptiveness among health authorities to engage with stakeholders.
Nonetheless, more needs to be done to improve the timeliness of drug and device approvals, expand National Health Insurance coverage for innovative treatments, and strengthen Taiwan’s biomedical export potential. Regulatory alignment, predictable pricing mechanisms, and data-driven policy frameworks are essential for ensuring the sector’s strategic durability. Taiwan’s healthcare spending reached 7.8% of GDP in 2023 – a marked improvement from 6.6% in 2022, but still below the 2023 OECD average of 9.2%. The shortfall is especially concerning given Taiwan’s growing shortage of hospital nursing staff.
The Chamber calls for institutionalized public-private partnerships, evidence-based reimbursement reform, and alignment with international regulatory best practices to enhance system resilience and position Taiwan as a regional leader in biomedical innovation. Stakeholders continue to recommend adoption of a formal performance monitoring mechanism for the Healthy Taiwan initiative to track indicators related to population health, access to innovation, and system responsiveness.
Investment in mental health and chronic disease prevention remains insufficient relative to Taiwan’s aging population and projected care needs. Greater integration of digital health tools into the National Health Insurance system, including remote monitoring and AI-driven decision support, would alleviate clinical bottlenecks while supporting healthy aging.
The Chamber also urges broader use of balance billing mechanisms for novel devices and reform of the health technology assessment process to better accommodate value-based evidence. The Taiwan Food and Drug Administration’s pace of reform in aligning with the Medical Device Single Audit Program and eliminating redundant documentation continues to be too slow. Meanwhile, limited use of horizon scanning and prospective budgeting by the National Health Insurance Administration impedes access to new therapies.
Further recommendations include the adoption of a patient-centric multimorbidity care network and risk-based stratification for chronic disease management, supported by increased screening for such high-risk groups as individuals with kidney disease and metabolic conditions. For elderly populations, targeted interventions can improve early detection of chronic diseases and continuity of care. Public health resilience would also benefit from stronger immunization infrastructure, including increased vaccine funding, integrated data systems, and updated access strategies for adults and children.
In smart healthcare, the government should accelerate adoption by expanding incentives, reimbursement, and trial programs that support telemedicine, home care platforms, and AI-driven decision support. Likewise, continued investment in cancer screening and timely access to innovative treatments through the Cancer Drug Fund will be critical to improving long-term outcomes. These combined measures will help ensure a more equitable, efficient, and resilient healthcare system capable of withstanding future demographic and epidemiological pressures.
Talent. On labor and talent policy, demographic pressures and skill shortages demand bold and coordinated solutions. The Chamber welcomes initial steps to improve work permit transparency and digitalize application processes. However, persistent administrative barriers, rigid employment classifications, and slow integration of foreign professionals undermine Taiwan’s global competitiveness. Several committees have reported significant delays in onboarding due to unpredictable visa and document authentication procedures.
To address these gaps, we suggest adoption of a flexible employment framework, broader recognition of foreign credentials, and streamlined entry for dependents. A more inclusive labor market and efficient talent pipeline are fundamental to sustaining economic growth. Additionally, AmCham urges the government to develop a unified national talent strategy to align education and workforce development policies with industry needs, including expanded support for STEM education, vocational retraining, and digital literacy.
The government is also encouraged to improve inter-agency coordination on labor and talent policy. Introducing tiered processing timelines, automatic case status notifications, and pre-verified employer programs would significantly reduce administrative burdens and signal that Taiwan is serious about attracting and retaining global talent.
BOLSTERING U.S. RELATIONS
The United States remains Taiwan’s most important economic partner. While the change in U.S. administration introduces new dynamics, Taiwan must remain proactive in pursuing a comprehensive and reciprocal trade agreement. Measures should be taken to advance shared economic interests and create goodwill in Washington but also strengthen Taiwan’s own economic resilience by deepening access to the U.S. market, reinforcing supply chain security, and demonstrating Taiwan’s commitment to high-standard trade practices.
At the same time, Taiwan should continue to press for meaningful engagement on tariff relief and expedite preparations for a double taxation avoidance agreement. The passage of enabling legislation by the U.S. House of Representatives is a promising development, but securing Senate approval and finalizing a reciprocal framework will require sustained, proactive engagement.
The Chamber also encourages more structured bilateral engagement through working groups and public-private dialogues on areas such as supply chain security, digital trade, and regulatory cooperation. As Taiwan and the United States deepen their commercial and strategic alignment, institutionalized consultation mechanisms will be vital to sustaining progress and managing relations.
LOOKING AHEAD
The government has taken important steps to place resilience at the center of national strategy, but these must be matched by concrete, innovative, and sector-specific implementation. The Chamber urges the administration to act decisively on committee recommendations and ensure that high-level policy visions are realized through measurable, timely, and inclusive reforms.
AmCham remains committed to supporting Taiwan’s long-term success. Through constructive dialogue and close collaboration with government stakeholders, we look forward to advancing practical solutions that build an open, secure, and globally competitive Taiwan.
打造韌性台灣
2025年,全球貿易與地緣政治情勢充滿高度的不確定。地緣經濟競爭、供應鏈重組與戰略情勢緊張升級,已深刻改變跨國企業的營運環境。各國政府紛紛重新審視其貿易協定、投資框架及產業政策,以回應國家安全、經濟自主及科技領導權等新興優先議題。
在此背景下,台灣憑藉其穩健的經濟基礎、民主治理體系與關鍵產業的領先地位,持續扮演值得信賴的戰略夥伴角色。就人均金融淨資產而言,台灣名列全球最富裕的經濟體之一,且在全球經濟中扮演超乎規模的角色;作為全球先進半導體的主要生產地,台灣占全球晶圓代工產能逾六成,尖端製程更超過九成。
台灣在專利申請與創新成果方面表現卓越。其高科技產業、強勁的出口動能與完善的法治基礎,使台灣成為全球供應鏈不可或缺的關鍵樞紐,並於電子、醫療、綠能與人工智慧等領域中居要角。然而,面對全球局勢瞬息萬變,台灣亟須持續強化基礎建設、監管制度與治理能力的韌性,以確保競爭優勢。
過去一年,政府加大力度,強化台灣面對衝擊與不確定情勢的應變能力。賴清德總統於總統府下設立三個相互連動的新委員會,分別為國家氣候變遷對策委員會、健康台灣推動委員會及全社會防衛韌性委員會,以「國家韌性」為核心主軸,展現其治國藍圖。
此等高層級架構象徵政府採取全民參與策略,將氣候政策、公共衛生與全社會防衛納入一套連貫的政策架構中,藉此強化台灣主動應對挑戰與深化國際合作的能力,並將「韌性」落實為國家政策的核心原則。此一政策思維為2025年的國家戰略定下基調,聚焦於強化關鍵系統、維持經濟活力,並深化與理念相近國家的夥伴關係。
除了強化自身韌性,台灣亦日益展現其於戰略領域推動全球解方與制定具前瞻性標準的潛力。本次《2025台灣白皮書》即體現此一願景,透過各產業委員會章節,突顯台灣於數位監理、半導體政策與智慧財產權改革等領域的領導地位。
企業在促進社會韌性與經濟繁榮方面,亦扮演不可或缺的角色。身為雇主、創新推動者以及關鍵產品與服務的提供者,企業不僅支撐著民生、公民健康與國家安全,亦是基礎建設發展、數位轉型與永續進程中的核心夥伴,其投資不僅驅動經濟成長,更提升台灣因應全球挑戰、滿足需求轉變與自危機中復原的能力。故此,將產業納入國家韌性政策設計,為確保長期繁榮之關鍵。
過去一年,台灣在利害關係人參與、數位轉型、基礎建設及醫療體系規劃方面取得若干進展,然整體成效尚不均衡,許多高層政策承諾未能有效轉化為具體、可衡量的成果。
在2024年台灣白皮書所列舉的97項議題中,僅9項獲得完全解決。雖2023年提出之議題中,約四分之一已有進展或獲得解決,然2024年新增議題中僅約十分之一達成類似成果。約半數議題仍處於觀察階段,另有四分之一尚無明顯進展或遭擱置。此進展凸顯政府亟需更積極與委員會合作,以提升台灣的長期競爭力與制度韌性。
當前正是台灣展現其開放、靈活且具全球競爭力市場形象的關鍵時刻。除延續「全民防衛韌性」之政策目標,政府亦應重視並參採美國商會各產業委員會提出的具體可行建議,以改善整體經商環境,進而提振投資人信心。
推動台灣法規架構與國際標準監管體系接軌,是強化國家與經濟韌性的根本要務。隨全球供應鏈接受更嚴格檢視,且跨境營運日益複雜,建立具可預期性、透明度且與國際標準一致的監理環境,對於吸引高品質投資與鞏固國際經貿地位具有關鍵意義。
美國商會各委員會持續指出,台灣在監理實務與國際期待之間仍存顯著落差,對跨國企業構成營運挑戰。透過採納全球最佳實務,台灣可進一步確保其監理體系更具彈性、公信力與長期穩定性。
法規現代化
美國商會長期建議台灣與國際標準接軌,然而在數位平台安全港原則、利害關係人即時諮詢機制,以及醫療科技審查流程之可預測性等方面,現行制度仍與國際最佳實務存在顯著落差。台灣法規架構時常滯後,不僅提高企業法令遵循風險,也延宕創新成果落地。
在擬定法規過程中,提前公告草案並設置意見徵詢平台,為良好法制作業之基本要素。法規制定應秉持透明、問責與公眾參與原則,尤須在執行細節擬定階段強化主管機關與產業之間的持續溝通,以確保公告與評論程序得以實質落實。若能使此機制有效運作,將有助於提升政策品質,並建立主管機關、企業與社會之間的互信。
在美國商會的籲請下,台灣於2016年通過60天公眾評論期之規定,是一項受歡迎的進展,惟實務上仍存諸多落差。多數法規未能於草擬階段即充分公告,使企業難以預先掌握政策走向並及早因應。其主因在於現行函令對公告適用範圍定義過於狹隘,僅限於涉國際貿易、投資或智慧財產權之法規。然許多表面屬「國內規範」之政策,對跨境營運亦具深遠影響,卻未納入公告要求,削弱整體制度之完整性與公信力。
此外,「情況急迫」條款遭頻繁引用,削弱其正當性。美國商會呼籲政府明確定義「情況急迫」之適用情境,並取消「與貿易、投資或智慧財產權無關者」之例外,確保制度不致被濫用。同時,亦應強化對公告與徵詢流程之監督機制,以維護政策制定之正當性與透明度。
為確保法規審議之公平與效能,建議所有類型法規草案皆應納入60天公眾評論期,並自公告起即提供草案之雙語版本與標準化提案格式。美國商會已就此議題向國家發展委員會提出關切,重申制度落實對投資環境之關鍵影響。
與美國由國會主導立法不同,台灣多數法案由行政院主導草擬。倘能於法案草擬初期即納入公眾評論規範,將有助於提升政策品質,並強化法規之透明度與利害關係人參與度。及早邀集美國商會會員與其他國際利害關係人參與審議,亦有助政策設計更貼近實務,提升可行性。
建立常態性與制度化之對話平台,促使主管機關與外商得以定期進行政策溝通,對提升監理品質與與國際標準接軌至關重要。外商除能提供實務經驗與全球比較視角,亦有助台灣打造更具公信力與投資吸引力之法規環境。
美國商會呼籲行政院將法制作業改革列為施政優先事項,全面落實60天公眾評論期,並擴大適用範圍至所有類型法規。同時,應避免濫用「情況急迫」條款,推動雙語公告草案、早期利害關係人簡報會與政策說明會,以全面優化法規制定程序與成果。
全民參與實施架構
建立更具抗脆弱性的台灣,需要在各經濟領域進行更全面的改善,包括:
關鍵基礎建設
強化關鍵基礎建設之韌性,實為確保台灣經濟安全、科技領導地位與社會穩定之基本要素。美國商會呼籲政府採取更具前瞻性且協調一致之策略,全面提升數位、能源與通訊等核心基礎設施之整體效能。建議行政院設立跨部會任務小組,專責盤點當前建設瓶頸,簡化規劃與採購流程,並提升國家韌性目標的一致性。
電網設施的現代化應列為優先要務,尤須加大於儲能系統、需量反應技術與再生能源整合等領域之投入。建立一套透明且能反映實際成本之電價機制,對於提升能源基礎設施效率與吸引持續投資,實具關鍵意義。與此同時,公共工程採購制度亦有改革之必要,以提高行政效率,避免事後條件變更,並降低延宕風險。
數位基礎建設,包括資料中心與雲端服務供應商,乃驅動台灣邁向AI驅動轉型之核心引擎。美國商會支持導入績效導向之能源標準,使業者得以依據自身情境,選擇最具成本效益與創新潛力之營運模式,進而提升能源使用效率,並保留投資誘因。為確保國家資產安全與數位主權,建議採用符合國際標準之資安架構(如零信任架構),並制定更具一致性之雲端採購政策。
通訊基礎設施亦須同步精進。美國商會重申過往建議,包括政府宜添購海底電纜專用維修船,以因應日益頻繁之海纜中斷事件。此外,建議制定統一之公共基礎設施使用準則(如電線桿、建物屋頂與地下管道等使用規範),明確規範電信業者存取流程,以加速5G建設,尤應優先推動偏鄉地區之建設,並強化整體網路韌性。
整體而言,落實上述建議,將有助於建立一套整合性強、可持續發展,且具高度前瞻性及應對緊急事件的基礎建設體系,不僅足以強化對長期趨勢與突發衝擊之承受力,更能推動台灣產業升級與跨領域競爭力之整體躍昇。
國防
在國防與經濟安全層面,台灣須持續於戰略自主與國際合作之間維持適切平衡。美國商會支持台灣強化自我防衛能力,惟對近期「工業合作政策」之調整表達關切。現行政策未明確說明外商爭取國防合約所須投入之投資類型或技術交換條件(即「互惠方案」),亦將人才訓練、研究合作,或在地供應鏈建立等間接貢獻排除在外。此外,政策要求廠商於合約簽署前即作出承諾,更進一步加劇風險與不確定性。
美國商會呼籲,政府應調整政策方向,以提升政策可預測性、確保商業可行性,並鼓勵外商對台灣國防產業進行長期投資。建議內容包括:恢復互惠比例門檻、納入與國家優先發展領域相符之間接互惠項目,並於互惠成本揭露方面保障商業機密;同時,互惠協議簽訂之時機應與軍售合約同步,以降低前期投標風險。
除採購政策外,台灣國防韌性亦有賴於「軍民兩用供應鏈」之健全與多元化。美國商會支持政府推動關鍵零組件在地製造、供應商多元化,以及國防資通訊系統資安標準之強化等措施,並鼓勵民間產業與國安單位保持密切協作,以共同辨識潛在漏洞,導入具成本效益之防護機制。
數位政策
台灣於邁向「AI島」之進程中已取得顯著成果,並積極為量子科技的發展奠定基礎。政府對邊緣運算與AI資料基礎設施之持續投入,使台灣於高效能應用與智慧製造領域展現領先優勢。然而,目前AI應用仍缺乏一套明確且以風險為本之監管架構,加以主管機關間職責界線不清、雲端基礎設施適用規範不一,已成為阻礙民間企業投入意願之主要因素。
本年度白皮書中,相關委員會特別建議應由行政院統籌建構統一的數位治理架構,以整合現行分散之監管體系。針對AI等新興科技,應採原則為導向之監理模式,以免過度規範抑制創新,同時降低監管不足所帶來之國際聲譽與資安風險。美國商會建議推動數位中介平台之安全港原則、採納《馬尼拉中介者責任原則》,並強化用戶資料存取請求之正當程序。若未能及時推動改革,恐將面臨台灣民主價值與整體數位競爭力雙重受損的風險。
商會也注意到,國際雲端服務供應商亦日益關注台灣雲端產業所面臨之基礎建設成本壓力與監管不確定性。當前電價波動頻繁,且尚未訂定針對資料中心之配套政策,恐抑制未來投資動能。美國商會建議,台灣政府應制定涵蓋資安、永續性及電網整合之績效等導向標準。
能源與基礎建設
儘管政府已著手改善再生能源許可流程、穩定電價,並現代化採購制度,惟執行進度緩慢,加上監理權責分散,仍削弱外商於台投資之信心。政策方向搖擺不定,諸如突如其來的本地化要求與競標條件變更,已導致部分企業選擇暫停或撤回投資計畫。
美國商會重申以下建議:簡化核准程序、提升法規透明度,並保障外商公平進入市場之權利。目前跨部會協調機制仍屬不足,尤以大型再生能源與電網建設計畫為甚。建議政府於中央層級設置協調平台,強化中央與地方政府間之溝通,並就特定計畫成立技術任務小組,以提升專案執行成效。
美國商會長期支持台灣邁向2050淨零排放之願景,惟觀察所及,再生能源推動仍受電網壅塞與併網容量不確定性所掣肘,致使多項開發案遲未落實。多數業者反映,併網排序機制缺乏明確性與可預測性,已成當前重大障礙之一。另一方面,原被視為提升電網韌性之關鍵方案 – 儲能系統(BESS)市場,則面臨價格波動與投資訊號不明之挑戰。
有鑑於此,美國商會建議經濟部建立更為透明、可預測之市場參與架構,包含:訂定具體時程目標、設立基準價格機制、改革競標設計等,以穩定投資環境。
醫療保健
台灣於健保制度與醫療監理環境之開放性與協作性方面,近年已展現長足進展。「健康台灣推動委員會」之成立,更為跨部門對話開闢了寶貴平台。美國商會肯定主管機關對與利害關係人深化合作所展現之積極態度。
然藥品與醫療器材之審查流程仍有加速空間,創新療法納入健保給付之範疇亦亟待擴大,同時更應強化台灣生醫產業於國際市場之輸出潛力。與國際接軌的監理制度、具可預測性的價格機制,以及以數據為根基之政策架構,乃確保產業長期韌性之關鍵所在。台灣2023年的醫療保健支出已達國內生產毛額(GDP)的7.8%,相較於2022年的6.6%已有顯著提升。
本會呼籲政府建立制度化之公私協力架構,推動實證為基礎之給付改革,並落實與國際標準接軌之監理制度,以鞏固台灣作為亞太生醫創新樞紐之地位。同時,應為「健康台灣」倡議建立績效監測機制,據以追蹤全民健康、創新可及性與體系反應速度等關鍵指標。
面對高齡化加劇與日益龐大的照護需求,台灣於心理健康與慢性病預防之投資仍顯不足。倘能進一步將數位健康工具納入健保體系,例如遠距監測與AI輔助決策,將有助於減輕臨床負荷並促進高齡者健康。
美國商會亦建議擴大創新醫材之自費差額(balance billing)制度,並改革醫療科技評估(HTA)流程,使價值導向之臨床與經濟證據能獲充分納入決策機制。衛生福利部食品藥物管理署雖已於與「醫療器材單一稽核計畫(MDSAP)」接軌,以及簡化重複文件要求方面有所進展,惟整體進度仍待提升。此外,健保署對新療法缺乏前瞻性評估機制與醫療科技預測(horizon scanning)能力,亦限制創新可及性與政策之前瞻規劃。
美國商會建議引進以病人為中心之多重慢性病照護模式,並透過風險分層管理強化慢性病預防。對於高風險族群(如腎病與代謝異常患者)應強化篩檢,以提升早期診斷率與照護之連續性。為強化全民健康韌性,亦建議提升疫苗接種基礎設施,包括增加疫苗預算、整合資料系統,以及提升成人與兒童疫苗之可近性。
在智慧醫療方面,政府宜加速推動政策,如擴大獎勵措施、給付政策與試辦計畫,以推動遠距醫療、居家照護平台及AI輔助決策工具之應用。亦應持續深化癌症篩檢策略,並透過「癌症新藥基金(Cancer Drug Fund)」提升創新療法可及性,以增進長期治療成果。上述各項措施,將有助於建構一個更公平、高效且具韌性的醫療體系,以因應未來人口結構轉變與流行病學之挑戰。
人才
勞動與人才政策方面,台灣正面臨日益嚴峻的人口壓力與技能落差,亟需果斷且協調一致的政策。美國商會肯定政府近年來於提升工作許可透明度及推動數位化申辦流程方面所展現之進展。然而,行政障礙依然存在,僵化的聘僱分類制度與外籍專業人才整合進度緩慢,正逐步削弱台灣的全球吸引力與競爭力。多個委員會指出,簽證核發與文件驗證流程的不確定性,常使新進人員無法如期報到,延誤企業運作與即時到任。
為因應上述挑戰,本會建議政府導入「新型態服務承攬」(Independent Contractor Plus, IC+)等更具彈性的聘僱模式,擴大承認外國學歷與專業資格,並簡化眷屬入境流程。打造更包容的勞動市場與高效的人才引進機制,將是強化經濟韌性的關鍵基石。本會亦呼籲政府制定全國性人才戰略,整合教育與就業政策,緊扣產業實際需求,聚焦於強化STEM(科學、科技、工程、數學)教育、技能再培訓及數位素養之推廣。
此外,政府部門應強化跨部會協調,整合目前分散之人才政策資源。建議引進分級處理時程、案件自動追蹤機制,並設置「預審僱主資格制度」(pre-verified employers),以減輕行政負擔,提升審查效率,展現台灣吸引並留用國際人才的決心。
強化美台關係
美國依然是台灣最重要的經濟夥伴。即便面對美國政局變化所帶來的不確定性,台灣仍應主動推動全面且對等的貿易合作架構。美國商會支持台灣持續努力縮小雙邊貿易不平衡,鼓勵赴美投資並擴大進口美國商品。此類舉措不僅有助於推進雙方共同經濟利益、強化台灣在華府形象,亦可透過提升對美市場之可及性、加強供應鏈安全,以及展現高標準的貿易承諾,進一步鞏固台灣的經濟韌性。
同時,台灣應積極爭取推動關稅減免的實質進展及雙重課稅協定之磋商。目前,美國眾議院已通過授權法案,為推動相關協定奠定重要基礎,但仍需與參議院持續展開協調合作並爭取支持,方能建立互惠且穩固的法制架構。
美國商會亦建議美台雙邊建立更具制度化之互動機制,包括成立專責工作小組與定期之公私對話平台,聚焦於供應鏈安全、數位貿易與監管合作等重要議題。隨著雙邊在經濟與戰略領域的合作日益深化,制度化的溝通機制將有助於確保持續進展,並有效處理雙方可能出現之歧見與挑戰。
展望未來
政府已邁出關鍵一步,將「韌性」納入國家發展戰略核心。然而,唯有透過具體、創新且切合產業需求之改革,方能真正實踐國政願景。美國商會呼籲新政府果斷採納各委員會所提出之建議,確保高層政策能有效轉化為具體、可衡量且具包容性的成果。
美國商會將持續致力於支持台灣的長遠發展。透過建設性對話與政府緊密合作,我們期盼共同推動務實的解方,攜手打造一個開放、安全且具全球競爭力的台灣。